Projet Urbain - Référentiel de la démarche systémique dans l’écoconception du projet métropolitain durable

Abstract

In fact, the urban phenomenon has continued to conquer the planet, with more than twothirds of the population now living in cities. As a result, sprawling cities are becoming metropolises. The latter are of great interest to successive urban policies, given the major challenge of metamorphosis, resilience and an urban environment that is often far from socially acceptable. Furthermore, the interconnections of these same agglomerations within a logic of functionalist urbanism have generated a mode of mobility that is commuting and carbonised, and provided with inadequate infrastructure. Consequently, we are confronted with the disarticulation between urban planning, transport and environmental issues at the scale of the diffuse metropolis. This dysfunction refers to the ineptitude of the antagonistic theories, which have been implemented up to now with regard to the perception of the vulnerable image and the rehabilitation of the crumbling form of the hyper-mobile city The emergence of the concept of sustainable urban development (SUD), combined with postmodernist theories, has led to a new attitude towards the design of the safe city, where the issue of renewal claims to provide relevant or appropriate responses to the reality of the unavoidable Urban Project. This renewing posture of the development of the intense city will assert itself as an alternative for potential environmental governance, but also as a support for reflection and global consultation on the future of a city that is cybernetic and accessible to all, with a view to anticipating post-carbon evolutions. Therefore, environmental issues should be placed at the centre of the mobility ecosystem. For our part, this will reconcile the 7D framework (transport, air, energy, biodiversity, climate, Human and ICT) concomitantly. The objective is therefore to propose an alternative formula to continuously assess the optimal performance of their respective components in a new intelligent metropolitan design. Thus, the system-actors will have to intervene by being part of the systemic reasoning of the urban project. This multiscalar paradigm will involve synergies between interfering processes, such as the 2nd generation environmental approach to urban planning (EAUP2), the Sustainable Urban Planning and Development Referential Framework (SUPDRF) or even Chicklist (Linea21). This triptych is also included in the interactive protocol as well as the accompanying and evaluation of priority targets, in favour of an ecologically sustainable urban renewal.